Untitled Document
Gian Businesses Index & Contractors in Levin and wellington NZ
 
  Menu
 WORLD PROBLEMS
 Save world wildlife
 1080 NZ
 House buying Westport

 Lists: Machine parts

  Export Buyer for NZ

  Excavator buying

  CAT311-312 excavators

 TOP SOIL / CLEAN FILL

  Section Clearing

  Topsoil & cleanfill wanted
Section topsoil
 SE ASIA SHIPPING
 Shipping containers
 Shipping service
 
  FAQs
Contact us
 
GOLD BULLION
Gold Bullion 
SILVER PRICES
PLATINUM PRICES
Platinum
 
 
Locations of visitors to this page
Thailand Importers
Importers/shipping

 

 

EMAIL US BELOW:

 
 
     

CLIMATE CHANGE IS IT REAL OR

IS IT INTENDED TO MAKE A FEW RICH

& keep scientists in work

FB 11/11/2029 SIIM

Comment: China wants an annual production of raw milk to reach 10 million tonnes by 2025. Inner Mongolia recorded more than 2.3 million cows in stock and an output of over 6.9 million tonnes of raw milk in 2018. The Mudanjiang Mega dairy farm in Northeast China is the world’s largest. It marks a 1bn yuan (123 million euros) collaboration between Russian and Chinese investors. The farm is 50 times bigger than the biggest dairy farm in the UK, which has around 2,000 cows and three times bigger than the largest in the US, with 30,000 cows. It is mind-boggling to imagine the scale of such a farm and the fact that it can produce 800m liters of milk a year. The expansion of the farm happened in 2015 as a response to the Russian ban on dairy products from the EU after Brussels imposed economic sanctions following the Ukraine Crisis. However, a solution to the problem was quickly addressed when China stepped in. Dairy cows were imported into China from Australia, New Zealand, and Uruguay & they aren’t even kicked the ball off??? Now figure out how youre gonna tell China & Russia to stop emissions……….???? yet NZ going for zero so farmers will be penalized. Better to start dairy in Russia or China or Uruguay. 

 

 

"The environmental movement is really a political activist movement," says the Greenpeace co-founder?

"Climate Change is a Hoax ....Big Money For Scientists to get Grants....Climate Change is Welfare for Scientists!!"

 

The story from Mishtalk

 

When cosmic rays GO up, temperatures GO down.
When cosmic rays GO down, temperature GO up.

Vastly different records come together

Climate is controlled by the clouds. utifully.

TThe clouds are controlled by cosmic rays. &
The cosmic rays are controlled by the sun
It all comes down to the sun, not CO2.

Climate is controlled by the clouds.

 

 

from FB: South Island IM

As one says on Nat Geo: 7/11/2019

Climate "change" is a political tool for funding and for the division of the people..Nothing more nothing less the goddamn arrogance of human to think we control this planet.We are nothing but ant scurrying around on the surface.We could have an extinction level event at anytime.I suggest you take funds you use on this climate change bullshit and invest in space exploration we need to inhabit other planets to survive as a species.

As long as you can afford carbon credits, you're good to pollute as much as you want. Which, is the exact reason most people don't buy into this so-called "climate emergency". Ultra wealthy people are the only people who stand to benefit. Nothing changes except the amount of zeros in the elite bank accounts.

Why they waste the time and money on these conferences is beyond me. .....NOTHING ever happens to the countries that don't keep their promises of controlling their emissions! They just pay lipservice to appease the other attendants and probably have a lovely holiday whilst at the conferences all in their private jets???! All adding to the greenhouse gasses anyway! !!

WTF did we think was going to happen? The Paris Agreement was great and all but it was just words. Even if the US, UK, Canada, and every other European country does literally everything possible to mitigate this issue, we’ll still be totally screwed because of India, China, and the many other less developed countries who have no means to invest in any other energy other than coal.

For a start, the world’s great greenhouse emitters and polluters aren’t New Zealand. We emit one fifth of one per cent of the world’s emissions. 0.2%.And half of that is down to flatulent farm stock. We can stop burning coal, ban petroleum exploration, give up cars for non-existent public transport, euthanise all the dairy cows, and recycle all our own waste and the effect will be? Nothing. The world will be no cleaner nor greener. SI.IM FB: 7/11/2019

However, there will be a backward country down the bottom of the South Pacific that has returned to hunter-gatherer status. But given that we’ve barred air travel as evil and environmentally damaging, we will have to upload our primitive existence so that the world might marvel from a distance.The truth is that the world’s great polluters are China, the USA, Russia, India and the European Community. Deal with that lot – especially the first four countries, and we might save the planet.

But, no. You won’t see Extinction Rebellion targeting the genuine villains because it doesn’t suit their political narrative. Which is that western capitalism is evil.China apparently isn’t. Not with its 35 year plan to keep burning coal for power. Nor Russia. Nor a class-based construct like India. Let’s leave them alone.

What worries is that our schools are being utilised to politicise our young towards views that have no scientific rationale nor political reality. And by misidentifying the cause, we will always miss the solution.

 

No Climate Emergency Says NZ Geologist

Submitted by Mark Law

Earth has ice in its veins and nations like New Zealand are wasting resources and energy needlessly panicking over fossil fuels and so-called “climate emergencies”, says a New Zealand geologist once dubbed by Stuff as one of the“intellectual heavyweights of the Canterbury geological sciences department”.Over the years, I’ve noticed two obvious patterns:firstly, geologists, who are used to dealing with deep time and big pictures, tend to be remarkably sceptical about climate alarmism.
Secondly, older and retired scientists even more so.
As no less than David Suzuki argues, scientists who no longer have to toe the line of academic conventional wisdom in order to chase down grant money – or risk outright career destruction, like Peter Ridd – are dangerous to scientific groupthink, simply because they’re freer to say what they really think.

Professor David Shelley argues that the key assumptions of the climate alarmists are simply untrue, or of no concern.
Activists, with some success, are demanding climate emergencies be declared around the world, making those demands on the basis that temperatures are at record highs, glaciers and sea ice are melting at unprecedented rates, and sea levels rising dangerously.

A cursory examination of the geological literature shows that the first two assertions are simply not true, and that rising sea levels are par for the course.

Earth has been much hotter (up to 10C hotter) for the vast majority of geological time. Jurassic Period was very hot, and when the dinosaurs suddenly died out 65 million years ago, the succeeding age of mammals was similarly very hot.
The last million years (a mere heartbeat on the geological time-scale) has been atypically cold, with extraordinarily large fluctuations in temperature…the record would suggest we might soon descend into another dangerously cold glaciation.
I grew up in a beachside suburb. Not far away was a spit with a hill at its end. I later learned that, at one time, that hill had been an island.
Before that, the entire bay was a vast, shallow valley. Sea levels rise and fall constantly.

Sea levels are rising, but just 12,000 years ago, at the end of the last glaciation, sea levels were as much as 140m lower than today, and they then rose dramatically as we entered this interglacial.
Sea levels were significantly higher than today just a very short time ago.
Sea levels were also significantly higher in the last interglacial 125,000 years ago; Florida Keys, for example, is the remains of a coral reef that grew then.

The really major ice melt was during the transition from the last glaciation to today. Canada was covered entirely by a massive sheet of ice with no vegetation and New Zealand’s South Island lakes were 1km-thick glaciers — so today’s reductions in sea ice and glacier volumes are quite trivial.

But what about those dangerous greenhouse gases?

Alarmists assert that despite all that, CO2 is a greenhouse gas and we are pumping large quantities of it into the atmosphere, causing catastrophic warming.
But the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change does not know how potent CO2 is as a greenhouse gas…
if climate sensitivity is low (close to one) then our emissions will never dangerously warm Earth.
Climate sensitivity due to CO2 alone is actually just one, but climate scientists add all sorts of uncertain feedback effects to make it higher.

Which sounds suspiciously like massaging data to fit the theory, a key characteristic of pseudoscience.

It is an indictment of our education system that students are convinced today’s climate change is extraordinary when it falls well within the bounds of natural climate change.
They should be told, too, that we do not know how potent CO2 is as a greenhouse gas.

None of this means we should treat our world with cavalier disregard.
But surely we should concentrate on real problems, which we can fix, rather than fretting about scary sky dragons.We must stop polluting the oceans, stop overfishing, find more sustainable sources of electricity and control population growth.
Given the present reality that large nations such as China dominate global emissions and are increasing them, nations such as Australia and New Zealand need not panic over the use of fossil fuels…I suggest to the activists that the clarion call for action should be “managing the environment and sustainability”, not “stopping climate change”.

The very idea that we can stop climate change is barking mad. Climate change is inevitable, as geology has always shown.

 

The purpose of climate change alarmism is to promote global socialism. Yet the socialist politicians are not panicking to cut their own carbon footprints and live like the Amish. The politicians don't believe their own climate propaganda. Neither should anyone else. In the 1970’s it was claimed the world was facing a man made ‘Ice Age’ due to global cooling with catastrophic crop failure by the year 2000 and the world being a frozen block of ice by 2020 as a result of average global temperatures falling by as much as 7 degrees.

 

The UN and Al Gore and Greenpeace all need to be held accountable for libel. These are the same jack @sses that insisted the Earth was entering an ice age in the 1970s.... and the alleged cure for that was also higher taxes. Now global warming, and the alleged cure is higher taxes again? They aren't even trying to come up with believable bull sh!t.

If you are a left wing nut job and you want higher and higher taxes until there is mass rebellion, grow a pair and admit that is what you want. Stop trying to manufacture quack science to support your perpetual tax increases.

You know these nut jobs don't believe their own quack science when they have a global conference, and all the fraudsters show up in separate private jets. Many of the parasites didn't even pay for their own private jets, they had suckers (donors?) pay for all the flights. Each private jet burned more fuel on that flight than the average citizen uses in a year. The eco-terrorists don't believe their own bull sh!t.

The Paris Accord was signed by politicians who don't pay for their own gasoline, and rolled into their conference in heavily armored limos with dozens of escort vehicles, helicopters, and motor cycles for each crook. Once again, do what they say, not what they do. Onerous fossil fuel taxes for you, armored limos and massive entourages for us.

The most common greenhouse gases is CO2 or carbon dioxide. In fact, because it is so common, scientists use it as the benchmark or measure of things that warm the atmosphere.

 

SO HOW TO MEASURE

Methane, another important GHG, for example, is 28-36 times as warming as CO2 when in the upper atmosphere (USEPA GWP – Global Warming Potential – estimate over 100 years), therefore, 1 ton of methane = 28-36 tons eCO2 or CO2 equivalents.METHANE or CH4 is produced in many combustion processes and also by anaerobic decomposition, for example, in flooded rice paddies, pig and cow stomachs, and pig manure ponds.

 

Nitrous oxide, NO/N2O or simply NOx a byproduct of fertilizer production and use, other industrial processes and the combustion of certain materials. Nitrous oxide lasts a very long time in the atmosphere.

Fluorinated gas came about as replacements for ozone depleting refrigerants, but it is long lasting and extremely warming GHGs

CO2  is produced any time something is burned. It is the most common GHG, constituting by some measures almost 55% of total long-term GHGs.

 

Climate is controlled by the clouds.

TRUMP SAID IT ALL

In Jan 29th 2019 President Trump wrote: In the beautiful Midwest, windchill temperatures are reaching minus 60 degrees, the coldest ever recorded. In coming days, expected to get even colder. People can’t last outside even for minutes. What the hell is going on with Global Waming? Please come back fast, we need you!???

Now doesnt that tell you something when in NZ close to the sea the tides & the sand hills remain as they have done for the last 150 yrs without movement in from the shore line. Sure some places are prone to erosion but thats due to tidal changes & undercurrents.

 

Global warming is a gradual increase in the overall temperature of the earth's atmosphere generally attributed to the greenhouse effect caused by increased levels of carbon dioxide, CFCs, and other pollutants.

 

China is still the world’s largest polluter, with an economy that is reliant on heavy industry and an energy sector solely dependent on smog-producing coal. China’s incredible transformation can hardly be overstated BUT THEY HAVENT got that far in suppressing the emissions from the many factories or the polluted rivers, lakes and sea. They have 2 billion people to think about so ask yourself how will they handle the Climate change to appease this many. Besides how many fighting for climate change never talk about---well we have too many people on this planet??? 67 million people per year added then that adds the air condition unit in China, India even USA spiralling. Public pressure is weak, the government's actions often fail to match its rhetoric, especially when economic needs take priority & most of the lobbies are shot down as grass roots. One-party rule means freedom from electoral cycles and less need for public consultation. China is too busy making money & they forget the environmental issues and the what goes into the sea or air.

 

 

   

 

 

 

THE "WINDFALL" THOSE WHO MADE MONEY

from climate change

McKenzie Funk’s 2013 book, Windfall, a read on who made $$$$ from climate and begins with a 2008 faux-rainforest party for Deutsche Bank’s DWS Climate Change Fund. DWS bought into green tech like smart electric meters but also agriculture giants like Monsanto, whose genetically modified seeds would produce drought-resistant plants. A little bit of mitigation, a little bit of adaptation. One problem: By the time Funk’s book came out, the fund had been shut down for poor performance. McKenzie Funk spent six years reporting around the world on how we are preparing for a warmer planet. Funk shows the way to understand the catastrophe of global warming is to see it through the eyes of those who see it most clearly—as a market opportunity.

Global warming’s physical impacts can be separated into three broad categories: melt, drought, and deluge. Funk travels to two dozen countries to profile entrepreneurial people who see in each of these forces a potential windfall.

The melt is a boon for newly arable, mineral-rich regions of the Arctic, such as Greenland—and for the surprising kings of the manmade snow trade, the Israelis. The process of desalination, vital to Israel’s survival, can produce a snowlike by-product that alpine countries use to prolong their ski season.


Drought creates opportunities for private firefighters working for insurance companies in California as well as for fund managers backing south Sudanese warlords who control local farmland. As droughts raise food prices globally, there is no more precious asset.


The deluge—the rising seas, surging rivers, and superstorms that will threaten island nations and coastal cities—has been our most distant concern, but after Hurricane Sandy and failure after failure to cut global carbon emissions, it is not so distant. For Dutch architects designing floating cities and American scientists patenting hurricane defenses, the race is on. For low-lying countries like Bangladesh, the coming deluge presents an existential threat.


Funk visits the front lines of the melt, the drought, and the deluge to make a human accounting of the booming business of global warming. By letting climate change continue unchecked, we are choosing to adapt to a warming world. Containing the resulting surge will be big business; some will benefit, but much of the planet will suffer. McKenzie Funk has investigated both sides, and what he has found will shock us all. 

 

CHECK WHICH BANKS FINANCE CLIMATE CHANGE

& WHAT THEY DO [ HERE ]

In the last quarter of 2017, Soros Fund Management reported investments in eleven new fossil fuel corporations totalling nearly $160 million, according to his company’s December 31, 2017, filing before the Securities and Exchange Commission reviewed by TheDCNF. Soros not only invested in oil and natural gas companies, but also into coal. Soros tried to position himself as an enemy of coal, stating at the 2009 Copenhagen climate change summit, “There is no magic bullet for climate change, but there is a lethal bullet: coal.” Remember when Obama shutdown coal mines nationwide? George Soros bought up Peabody for 10 cents/dollar. SNL Energy reports that Soros “opened a new equity stake in coal and gas producer CONSOL Energy Inc., purchasing about 5.1 million shares of the company.... but theres much much more.............& so much for climate change as an about turn by Soros? Yet in 2019 he backs the new initiative. Meanwhile Greenpeace says It’s the use of fossil fuels – coal oil & gas is the main culprit

Since the late 1970s, oil companies have published research broadly in line with the standard views on global warming. Despite this, oil companies organized a climate change denial campaign to disseminate public disinformation for several decades.

 

 

IN COMES AL GORE THE PROMOTER OF

THE END OF THE EARTH

& CLIMATE CHANGES

In 2001, Al Gore was worth under $2 million. By 2012, he made a neat $100 million as he had a leg into the US Government lobby. Gore invested in 14 green companies, who inhaled — via loans, grants and tax relief — around $2.5 billion from the federal government to go Green. Gore’s investment firm at one point held 4.2 million shares of an outfit called Iberdrola, which was building 20 wind farms across the United States. Iberdrola managed to receive $1.5 billion from the federal government & needed it as they were near bust. Gore of course had friends in the box seat so thats how he managed to get where he is today. Then along came Johnson Controls. Johnson makes batteries, including those for electric cars. Gore’s investment company, Generation Investment Management (GIM) doubled its holdings in Johnson Controls in 2008, when shares were $9 a share. GIM sold when shares cost $21 to $26 — before the market for electric-car batteries fell over.Lucky for Gore, Obama also gave $299m & now he can fly anywhere in his jet plane spewing gases for $175,000 per lecture & live in his mansion. Not bad at all.........

 

THE UN A MONEY MAKER FOR WHO?

 

UN Secretary-General António Guterres called on all leaders to come to New York on 23 September with concrete, realistic plans to enhance their nationally determined contributions by 2020, in line with reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 45 per cent over the next decade, and to net zero emissions by 2050. He needs donations for his UN & since USA doesnt want a part of the paris accord stupid Nations like NZ are dipping into the taxpayer till to help other countries with Climate Change. NZ needs this money & has little impact on the climate period. Yet Asia--- China, India, don't care a damn and give very little to climate change and with the USA never committed to anything at this meeting.India gave no timeline, or commitment to raise India’s official carbon emission reduction targets under the Paris Agreement. China highlighted the pace at which its worked to meet its current goals, but also did not signal exactly how it might raise ambitions in its climate plan moving forward.So its achieving nothing since these guys are the biggest pollutors. The summit led to more money to help developing nations with their climate efforts through the Green Climate Fund. Sweden, Denmark, Switzerland and Norway among others, who doubled their current pledges to the fund, helping that fund reach $7 billion. NZ Greens want to give $15m? we were told--alright if you have the spare money but why not fix the problems of roads, people living in cars---real estate thats gone so high it will in debt kids of the buyers & due to immigrants & refugees coming to live in the open door policy of filling empty spaces. Can the food supply hold out---well 1080 all of a sudden enter the food chain & then what will happen when a major economy crash hits? Think about it cause noone else is..

 

WILLIAM HAPPER

Happer by the way is a physicist. He taught at Columbia University and joined the faculty at Princeton University in 1980.In 1993, the Princeton professor was taking a break from academia to direct scientific research at the U.S. Department of Energy. He turned askeptical eye toward one of then-Vice President Al Gore's favorite issues: the risks posed by chemicals eating away at ozone in the stratosphere and letting in dangerous ultraviolet radiation. As the story goes, Happer went to the White House and told Gore's staff he saw no evidence that the ozone hole actually was hurting anyone. Gore didnt like it & Happer was sacked. Today William Happer is back in the White House, still fighting against what he considers unfounded claims that our globe is in danger. But this time, his cause is backed by the man in the Oval Office.

GEORGE SOROS

Gwen Ives states: “Climate change” is a hoax created by George Soros and his lacky Al Gore to skim oil company profits by forcing a government theft (tax) on carbon dioxide, which is supposedly a green house gas. This is why they started with the name “global warming”… that’s what it was called, this hoax.. but since it was shown that all the data was fudged and the ice caps are growing that changed it to “climate change” because that way they don’t have to be specific. They fail to mention that water vapor.. that’s right, good ole H2O, is a thousand times more potent a greenhouse gas than CO2, but there is no money in that.. can’t skim oil companies with that. And to put it in perspective the Earth has been around for billions of years and forests have existed and been burned for at least hundreds of millions of years.. the tiny little bit of burning that goes on from cars and machines and electric plants is extremely tiny compared to forest fires that have occurred for MILLIONS OF YEARS… and a million years of forests burning, compared to a hundred years of oil burning, it is absurd, the forests win by like a billion….

 

 

HOW ELIZABETH WARREN VIEWS CLIMATE CHANGE

Elizabeth Warren sees climate change as a national security concern, an economic threat and opportunity, and the consequence of a violation of public trust. So rather than looking at climate change direct, Warren is looking at climate change through the eye of her other ideas which means she sees the problem is money in politics. This means going up against the oil companies who fleece & will come under her anti corruption bill ending lobbying. She sees that almost a quarter of US greenhouse gas emissions come from fossil fuels — oil, gas, and coal — extracted from territory administered by the federal government. Now wonder how that fits in with Soros funding & he having shares in these types of companies.Warren has a bill that would accomplish this, the Climate Risk Disclosure Act but she wants to tax the rich [sure OK but guess where the rich will place their $$$] & then wants to forgive student loans which is a Govt creation not a free market creation [ so schools etc will be free to raise the fees ]. The politics of global warming have been affected by climate change denial and the political global warming controversy, undermining the efforts to act on climate change or adapting to the warming climate

 

 

AS FOR THE ACTIVIST KID

October 2019: Russia's Putin said: "Go and explain to developing countries why they should continue living in poverty and not be like Sweden," he added, before saying that it was deplorable how some groups are using Thunberg to achieve their own goals. 

Macron and his French government have warned teenage climate activist Greta Thunberg’s“radical” stance risks “depressing a generation".

Her parents push her & are ANIFA. Thunberg  filed a legal complaint accusing five countries of inaction on global warming --- but forgot about China. How come she doesn't talk about or go to China & left China out ??? At the U.N. Climate Action Summit on Monday, China—the world’s biggest carbon emitter— wont commit to emissions reductions. The Chinese argument has always been—with considerable justification—that the energy needs of a growing middle class of hundreds of millions of people make actual reductions impossible without leaving people trapped in poverty. (It wasn’t alone among leading polluters: The United States, Japan, and Australia have not offered any new commitments.)

 

NOW LOOK AT INDIA

 

November 2019 FIRES START Smoke-filled skies led to hazardous air quality in many cities, hundreds of flight cancellations and delays, widespread school closures, and a two-week driving ban in Delhi.The fires release several types of gases into the atmosphere, including smog-forming carbon monoxide and nitrogen dioxide. They also release aerosols, such as black carbon and organic carbon, that contribute to elevated levels of PM2.5, which can cause health problems.

While industrial pollution and dust can contribute to the haze, most of it comes from crop-burning—especially in the states of Punjab and Haryana, where rice and wheat are widely grown. Burning typically peaks during the first week of November, a time when many farmers set fire to leftover rice stalks and straw after harvest, a practice known as stubble or paddy burning. The burning often coincides with falling temperatures and slow wind speeds, meteorological conditions that can lead to temperature inversions, which trap smoke in place.

 

 

 

Finally, a quote from Princeton physicist

on Climate change

William Happer (Climate Depot, 1/22/15, mirrored here: “A Noted Physicist Speaks Out”):

“…the jihad against atmospheric carbon dioxide. Like its predecessors, this cause has generated plenty of sanctimonious slogans: ‘intergenerational justice’, ‘saving the planet’, ‘sustainability’, ‘negligible carbon footprints’. In reality, the cause has brought ugly, bird-killing windmills, which have replaced the psalmist’s ‘cattle on a thousand hills’; hapless native peoples have been expelled from their from ancestral lands, sometimes at gunpoint, so wealthy corporations and foundations could claim to be saving the planet, at no small profit to themselves; fraud in the trading of carbon credits has cheated honest taxpayers. But for this cause, as for most of its predecessors, the end justifies the means. Policies to ‘stop climate change’ are based on climate models that completely failed to predict the lack of warming for the past two decades. Observational data show clearly that the predictions of unacceptable warming by more carbon dioxide are wrong…policies designed to save the planet from more carbon dioxide are based on failed computer models.”

 

Profits for “the right people,” however, aren’t failing.

Jon Rappoport

 

NOW FOR NZ's CLIMATE CHAIN

[ Check more here ]

 

More than 31,000 American scientists from diverse climate related disciplines, including more than 9000 with Ph.D.s, have signed a petition announcing their belief that “… there is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gases is causing or will, in the foreseeable future , cause catastrophic heating of the Earth’s atmosphere and disruption of the Earth’s climate. There are many other scientists globally who concur Greenpeace [ consultant & not a co-founder who left Greenpeace in 1986 ]  Patrick Moore said -“It is the biggest lie since people thought the Earth was at the center of the universe… It is a complete hoax and scam.” [7] The “97% global warming consensus” also appears fictitious. [8] However Moore says that the environmental movement Greenpeace "abandoned science and logic in favor of emotion and sensationalism"

Publicists at the United Nations, Mr. Al Gore, and their supporters frequently claim that only a few “skeptics” remain – skeptics who are still unconvinced about the existence of a catastrophic human-caused global warming emergency.

It is evident that 31,487 Americans with university degrees in science – including 9,029 PhDs, are not "a few." Moreover, from the clear and strong petition statement that they have signed, it is evident that these 31,487 American scientists are not “skeptics.”

These scientists are instead convinced that the human-caused global warming hypothesis is without scientific validity and that government action on the basis of this hypothesis would unnecessarily and counterproductively damage both human prosperity and the natural environment of the Earth.

 

Quote of the week:FB 30/10/2019 you want climate action, but what if the price is a 28% pay cut for every worker? At what point do you want certainty about the science? "NZIER estimate the cost of Zero Carbon 2050 at $85b per year, about 28% of current GDP. This is economic suicide over New Zealand producing 1/588th of global man made greenhouse gases. It will be worse if the primary sector is ruined."

 

 

By Ian Wishart

New Zealand’s Labour/Greens/NZ First government

appears to have seriously breached Article 2 of the

Paris Climate Accord in its proposed Zero Carbon Bill.

putting the credibility of the country’s climate change policy at risk.

 

 

The Zero Carbon policy has seen hundreds of thousands of hectares of good farmland sold off on a fast-track process to foreign carbon credit investors to plant forests, and it’s seen a serious drop in dairy, beef and sheep production. If it continues, the 12 million hectares currently used for farming will dwindle further and the 1.7 million hectares of mostly foreign-owned forest will grow considerably.

Farmers are warning the Zero Carbon Bill threatens NZ's ability to grow food as more productive land is converted to forest, in a reverse of the land clearing policies of the 19th century.

The Labour/Greens/NZ First obsession with killing off farming by planting trees on farmland, and selling the carbon credits to carbon billionaire traders like Al Gore, is a climate change policy going not just further than the Paris Climate Accord requires but actually in direct contravention of it.

The news that the Government’s attack on New Zealand’s biggest export earner is illegal under the Paris Accord will likely come as a shock, not just to farmers but also the wider public who’ve been watching helplessly while rich overseas investors have been hoovering up our best farmland without having to go through strict Overseas Investment Office requirements.

It’s a get rich quick scheme for carbon investors that is also having the effect of breaking up and destroying Fonterra and other New Zealand food producers competing with massive food multinationals … it’s a globalist’s dream: eliminate the competition by purchasing their farms and turning them into trees. Monsanto, Nestle and other globalist giants must be rubbing their hands together with glee.

REFUGEES TO NZ ON INCREASE

Each year, New Zealand accepts 750 refugees, increasing to 1,000 in July 2018, as part of an agreement with the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, whereby their status has been "mandated" or authenticated by the UNHCR.

 

So as one sees the fossel fuel companies have strong lobbies

& until they stop, the subject of climate change will just go on

and on with no impasse made. It won't

come overnght. Check countries who donate to the UN? while others don't

 

"Save the planet yet those who profess to saving it still spend on the very obstacles

that cause it---- but thats cause money is better then the world health "

 

Please note the writeups belong to those of their writers & promoters & all photos belong to the respective websites & owners. We publish on this website to make those aware of wildlife and birdlife species slowly being depleted & are non profit. Make the world know that wildlife deserves its place & we acknowledge those who are helping the world be a better place
Untitled Document
 

 

LATEST NEWS READ WORLD WILDLIFE [ Saving Wildlife species ] [ Primate Wildlife on Myanmar /Thai Border ]

LATEST CLIMATE CHANGE Oct 2019 [ Is climate change working ]

NZ 1080 CASES & WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW [ Latest drops of 1080 in NZ ] [ NZ 1080 poisoning land continued & Inter Orgs Info ] 1080-2 1080-3 1080-4 1080-5 ]

[ 1080 Orgs & Listings ] [ Monsanto & law suits ]

 

International law help ask us

 

[ Wallboard importers] [ Truck & Bus Tyre imports ] [Charcoal Imports ] [Paint Imports ] [Mobile Home Imports ] [Verandah roof imports ] [ Made to Measure Aluminium House lots ] [ Garment Imports ]

[ Used 40ft containers sell ] [ Rubber track imports ] [ Arabica Coffee ]

 

[ ] back to home

Email us: export@pobox.com